As is now usual, the posters of the opposition, has balanced by the response television Mr. Mayor.
Now I will not dwell on the central part of his speech, because I think a squalid Meccan and boring rhetoric, an arid list, a repetition of the same situations, same positions, the same poor things small. Hear those words excites us more than he can enthuse a math or reading a book on astronomy.
I dare say that was more concrete and proactive co-ordinator of MPA, this simultaneously on another channel, albeit with great difficulty of vocabulary, exhibited significant and interesting facts.
I confess that I preferred the gait uncertain but real Mr. D'Amico. And no matter if the language was not elegant or polished, but it was accurate. It is not always a useful language rhetoric cloaked in unnecessary and inconclusive. A language vague, ambiguous, uncertain that lends itself to false promises and assurances, without going to the speaker.
Our Mr. Mayor seems very close to saturation. He does not know what to say. The ongoing attempt to spread optimism and make for some difficult realizations, is a field plowed and very near to drain off. His words were reduced to tongs that grab the vacuum. Producing a great hoax, a swelling and bombast of the language, became a reality in itself which is a fictional world, a castle of mist from which the city seems unable to escape, but the fog soon diraderà, swept away by the inability of Our administrators, made clear to everyone now.
In any event, referring to the last part of the interview, Mr. Mayor, where he was asked if his many assignments subtract time administrative activity: he reassures us by supporting those who are not a distraction.
And here seem fair to explain our position. We believe that the problem is not the amount of time spent in the exercise of administrative functions, but it is a total lack of capacity. Mr. Mayor could also apply at night, the results would remain the same: for he, in our opinion, as an administrator is not good.
Therefore, the accumulation of multiple tasks, it is criticized because it does not commit the time of the Mayor, but for the many benefits that allows them to pocket. Now, Let there be a misunderstanding marginal pockets all that is perfectly legal, but it is equally correct in terms of morality?
And 'This is the central issue. It would not be morally right to give up the allowance received by the City, thus giving a sign of great integrity to the city?
We are confident that this mean for our directors, is like turning the fateful finger on, because none of them would be willing to give up the allowance, and we are fully convinced not only ourselves but also for all citizens.
In these times of economic crisis, many randazzesi in conditions of serious problems. So why not use the compensation of directors, all of whom have already a living, to help citizens who are in conditions need?
We know what a feeling those who feel they can not get to the end of the month, but we do not know, but imagine the feeling he feels Mr. Mayor, later this month when they found a wallet filled with beautiful bucks.
If this is true, and it is not our pure invention, boredom must sooner or later become sick, and then maybe end up the way lost.
Rasputin